Friday, October 07, 2016

Abandonment and Identity in Robert Pinsky’s new book At the Foundling Hospital

Robert Pinsky






Abandonment and Identity in Robert Pinsky’s new book At the Foundling Hospital

article by Michael Todd Steffen


In Robert Pinsky’s new collection of poems, At the Foundling Hospital, we get timely expressions of doubt, about facts, about information, the language that attempts to manage facts:

                                                                        It’s not

            Exactly our fungicides killing the world’s bees.
            The theory is, rather, the fungicides make the bees
            Die from our pesticides, otherwise harmless. Or,
            Maybe it’s the other way around, who knows?

Pinsky has elected to title the poem “CUNNING AND GREED” after bits of dialogue inserted in the poem from Dickens’ novel David Copperfield, resonating with the theme of the book of poems, with its title designating special hospitals or shelters (comemorated at the Foundling Museum in London, which also includes an impressive collection of 18th century art work) where abandoned infants, or orphans, Dickens’ heroes, could be left to be cared for.

            Near the end Uriah Heep says, David Copperfield,
            I’ve always hated you, you’ve always been against me.
            Copperfield retorts, As I’ve told you before, it’s you,
            Heep, who have been against the whole world…

            Your artful greed and cunning—against the whole world.
            And never yet has there been any greed and cunning
            That did not do too much and overreach themselves…

It is interesting that the poet for his title has inverted the accusing words from the passage, greed and cunning, to “CUNNING AND GREED.” Language is easily manipulated, even the words of Charles Dickens. It is a fact that undermines all “facts,” not threatening to poetry whose domain is the imagination,  yet bothersome to the social as well as natural sciences that use language to assert truths about humanity and the physical world. So the confusion is permitted as to what is killing the bees, the fungicide or the pesticide which makes the fungicide deadly… Or, “who knows?”

Poetry is hard enough to define. Some like it for its strangeness and riddlesome quality, for its ambiguous utterances producing irony or mild double-entendre, conveying two or several meanings simultaneously. “CUNNING AND GREED” serves as a good example of this, one of the many ways Pinsky’s poems can step beyond just pleasing us to dazzling, while they instruct—or rather, bring up things we perhaps need to be concerned with. We are not in the age of Lucretius or Pope where didacticism goes over with appreciation. So Pinsky defers ideology and the sermon to quotes from Dickens, managing to avoid any obvious banner-waving about a troubling environmental phenomenon (the spreading death of honey bees, thought by Einstein and other leading scientists to herald the end of our natural food chain) by leaping from the passage in David Copperfield to the mention of the bees. This way, he has called attention to the plight of these beneficial creatures without too much souring our pleasure at the reading, without getting in our face about it. The Dickens’ quotes are like old museum pieces. The “who knows?” protects us with its mild indifference or nonchalance. Though we have more and more cause of it, we don’t appreciate alarm. We may have just picked up on the bees themselves in the passage, which quietly appears to be about the confusion between fungicides and pesticides. The real problem gets lost in the debate. The passage mimes somewhat the national debate, about bees and everything else, about our being.

The thing about “information” these days with the Internet in everybody’s palm 24/7, there’s no shortage of it. For this reason, bringing up the threat to the bees gets a little more focus by its being showcased in a book by a nationally honored poet, not the vast anywhere of cyberspace that allows everything and anything. Among all the grave subjects he could take on, Pinsky’s discernment and delivery distinguish his poems. We may pause to remember the poem doesn’t place the national debate at its center, or bees, or David Copperfield. It holds up some weighing ideas in the title, “CUNNING AND GREED,” which are not directly addressed in the poem, while it sings and interweaves these various concerns, perhaps softly ruing some facts, disowned children and their agencies, a threatened environment, in a palatable way that is like simply giving voice to these pains and anxieties, singing the blues, as poets and singers do.

This is present in the flower at the beginning of the poem. The peculiar orchid is an example of cunning, or artifice, artfulness, in one of many deception strategies we recognize as intelligent in nature:

            An orchid that mimics an extinct female bee survives
            Persisting for generations with untouched pollen
            Stagnant inside it: an unmated simulation becoming
            A funeral portrait. Floral, archaic as rhymed verse.

It is a self-reflexive trope for the poet to announce that “rhymed verse” is “archaic.”The poem on the previous page, “THE WARMING,” also on an anxiety of the age, chants in rhymed couplets, bemusedly in the opening about the sexual origin of song, the symbiotic partner of the poem, the lyric:

            Young men like my uncles in olden times would “croon”:
            Walking or at work, a musical inward groan:

            The blue of the night meets the gold of the day.
            Ramona. Dance, Ballerina. Too-ra-loo-ra-lay.

            I asked my mother, why did they sing like that?
            Her enigmatic answer: They’re in heat.

            Stopped at a light just now a guy in his van
            Their same age, sound system blasting, windows down.

            We men like sounding hot. Or warm and charming—
            Even folk singers who rhyme about global warming…
Music has long been a key topic in Pinsky’s poetry, whether it’s a “Song of Porcelain,” “Louie Louie,” or a canto translated from Dante. The theme pulses with a strong vein in the new collection in titles like “Mixed Chorus,” the jazz rhythm poem “Horn,” in a recitation game called “Baseball” in “The City,” or in “Glory” evoking an ode by Pindar reminding us of the power of verse to celebrate and to be remembered—for over 2,000 years! If poetry is memorably significant, though, it is also as we find it in the title poem, “THE FOUNDLING TOKENS,” a lot of spare reminders and wishes in the way of personal keepsakes, scribbled notes, identifiers:

            At the Foundling Museum
            A wall displaying hundreds
            Of scraps, each pinned once
            To some one particular infant’s
            Nightie, nappie or blanket

            Each with surviving particulate
            Ink or graphite in studied lines
            Betokening a life…

Like the debate about fungicides or pesticides, rhyming poetry and rhyme’s archaic quality, music and poetry are both poignant and wondrous but also frail and evanescent.

            My friend was in a coma, so I dove
            Deep into his brain to word him back. I tried

            To sing Hallelujah, I Just Love Her So in
            Ray Charles’s voice. Of course the silence grew.

            I couldn’t sing the alphabet song. My voice
            Couldn’t say words I knew: Because I Could
            Not Stop For Death, He Kindly Stopped For Me…
                                                            (“IN THE COMA”)

(With the reference to “the alphabet song” perhaps we get a glimpse at a former poem that was very popular for Pinsky about ten years ago, “A, B, C”—“Any body can die…”)

Curious as the sound of a musical instrument being played, the opening poem, “INSTRUMENT,” makes a myth of the making of the first lyre out of a tortoise shell and strings of rabbit gut. We normally think of cat for the gut of stringed instruments. The rabbit in this poem perhaps brings an allusion to the fable of the tortoise and the hare, reminding the reader of the distractions, frustrations, impatience and ultimate slowness of the victory of finding music. The process involves the work of “a little newborn god” (Love, portrayed as a child god?—or perhaps left—“newborn”—at a foundling hospital), in an effort to sound the mystery of the—

            Sweet vibration of
            Mind, mind, mind
            Enclosed in its orbit…
Louise Glück has praised Pinksy’s “taste for assignments to which he devises ingenious solutions.”
So the solution to “Instrument,” as an artifact of the thinking triadic Mind, mind, mind itself:

            The newborn baby god—
            As clever and violent
            As his own instrument
            Of sweet, all-consuming
            Imagination, held
            By its own vibration:

            Mind, mind, mind pulled
            Taut in its bony shell…

            Thrumming from here to there
            In the cloven brainflesh…
            With its blood-warm channels…

Thought for the poet is like the hum of music. A stringed instrument may be as adequate a model of our psyches, language and of meaning (another of Pinsky’s curiosities) as theories by Freud or Jung, religions or philosophies.

An astonishing leap occurs between the first poem, “Instrument,” and the second, “Procession,” that reminds me of the leap in Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, between the stone-age ape bone tossed into the air and its correlative image of a spaceship navigating to the moon in the space age. From the birth of consciousness and the invention of the primitive tortoise-shell lyre, the second poem in Pinsky’s new book shuttles us to the dominance of scientific instruments observing the planet and worlds beyond and within:

            At the summit of Mount Kea, an array of antennae
            Sensitive to the colors of invisible light. Defiling

            The sacred mountain, they tilt and sidle to measure
            Submillimeter waves from across the universe:

            System of cosmic removes and fine extremes
            Devoted to track the wavering nature of things.

That is de rerum natura, the nature of things pervasively from the core through the sphere, “wavering,” between this and that, denoting a divide: it is a long and vast way to come from “the cloven brainflesh” in “Instrument.” If the national debate is split between fungicides and pesticides, the pattern for that division has been deeply established and is widely resonant. We didn’t make this up any more than it makes us up. Yet we are caught in this circle of ourselves.

Only recently John Koethe released his 10th book of poems, The Swimmer. Including his most recent Selected Poems, At a Foundling Hospital makes this Robert Pinsky’s 10th collection of poetry. Who said the 9th is always the most masterly? This is as curious, fun and moving a collection as he has put together. It sings and dances with humor, surprise and assurance and here and there draws across deep cello chords for our fears and sorrows, giving credence to the miracle of forging identity and culture out of human leftness, abandonment, witnessing the strange (self?) destruction in the wake of our inventions.


At the Founding Hospital
Poems by Robert Pinsky
Farrar Straus Giroux/New York
ISBN 9780374715472 (e-book)

Saturday, October 01, 2016

The Sunday Poet: Linda Larson


Linda Larson


Linda Larson was born and educated in the Midwest and spent childhood vacations and more than a decade of her adult life in Madison County, Mississippi. While in Mississippi, she worked as a feature writer for The Capitol Reporter and The Jackson Advocate. Larson relocated to the Boston/ Cambridge area where she has lived and worked for the past twenty years.
For five years she served as editor of and contributor to Spare Change News, a homeless newspaper based in Cambridge.
Over the years Larson has struggled with mental illness, homelessness and alcohol addiction.
She has been recognized by both houses of the Massachusetts Legislature for her advocacy work on behalf of people with mental illnesses.
As Larson’s life has become more manageable, she has been able to realize her long-term goal in putting together a collection of poetry, Washing the Stones, published by Ibbetson Press, August, 2007. These poems go a long way towards recapturing her promise as a graduate of the Johns Hopkins University Writing Seminars in the Seventies and as a teaching fellow in the creative writing doctoral program at the University of Southern Mississippi in Hattiesburg, Mississippi.


Movie Star



I met a movie star once at a party.
She was quiet, mousy, almost invisible,
not a magnet of attraction.
Yet on the silver screen  
her eyes were wild and her mouth
as luscious as a honeycomb.
Mother told me Bonnie and Clyde
were murdering thugs…
she ought to know,
she lived through the Depression
and read the newspapers of the day.
I miss her terribly.
There is a deep chill, a bone marrow of a chill, that sets in
when everyone you knew as a child is dead and lost forever.
Still the bright moving mosaic of the movies can
overpower one’s desolation and light fires in the cold
forgotten recesses of the human heart.


Friday, September 30, 2016

Admit One, An American Scrapbook by Martha Collins







Admit One, An American Scrapbook
by Martha Collins
© 2016 Martha Collins
University of Pittsburgh Press
Pittsburgh, PA
ISBN 13: 978-0-8229-6405-6
ISBN 10: 0-8229-6405-8
Sofbound, $15.95, 89 pages

Review by Zvi A. Sesling

Poetry is the poet’s version of what he or she observes or believes. There is “found” poetry which might be prose made into verse or roadside signs and billboards converted into poetic endeavors.  Within Collins’ book Admit One, poetry becomes a combination of many things: memoir, research, history, newspaper clippings, World Fair ads. It is a political statement and a revelatory expose of eugenics and racism.

There is a glorified view of America as a pure nation open to all as Emma Lazarus wrote in “The New Colossus”:

"Give me your tired, your poor,              
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

Yet behind that “golden door” Ms. Collins shows the negative nature of “white” America and her exposure of 20th century thoughts and actions spares no one, not even her own grandfather who published and edited a newspaper which referred to others as “subjects of the Mikado” or as “…fierce Cassocks; sooty Nubians, jostled yellow Mongols, and picturesque Turks, Moors, and Sudanese, added rich color to the picture…”

On page 12, entitled “Otta Benga, Part One” Collins presents the following”

Samuel P. Verner
Acquisition List

One Pygmy Patriarch or chief
One adult woman, preferably his wife
One adult man, preferably his son
one adult woman, the wife of…
Two infants of women in the expedition
Four more Pygmies, preferably adult but young
including a priestess and a priest
or medicine doctors, preferably old

Collins continues showing more of Verner’s “acquisitions” based on superior whites displaying non-white subjects as part of an exhibition in which foreign acquisitions are reduced to exhibits at the 1904 World’s Fair.

Collins next directs her attention to American Indians and the purchase of various items produced by different Indian tribes citing:

a representation of … human development
from savagery…toward enlightenment
as accelerated by association and training

She scrutinizes the Philippine Reservation in which humans are described as “Negritos, Igorots, Moros, Visayans” and so forth, each having different attributes such as the “lowest, most warlike, more intelligent and highest.”

Otta Benga, the African Pigmy was presented by the New York Times as follows:

BUSHMAN SHARES A CAGE
            WITH BRONX PARK AGES
                        their heads are much alike

and zoo director Hornaday said:
Madison Grant gave full approval
            We are taking excellent care
                        He has one of the best rooms
                                    in the primate house

Her tale of Otta Benga is not a pretty one and in many ways a modified extension of how blacks were treated during the slavery years.

Collins points out anthropologists declared that within the white race were three distinct types: Nordic, Alpine and Mediterranean and added race to eugenics “which was already leading to segregation and sterilization of the unfit…"

In 1911, Collins states the Iowa State Fair held its first Baby Health Contest where the questions was asked: You are raising better cattle…horses…hogs, why don’t you raise better babies? This resulted in babies being “measured for height, weight, anthropometic  traits and mental development, and advertised and displayed an an automobile in the Fair’s Parade, as Iowa’s Best Crop.”

Charles Davenport supervised the “Eugenics Record Office and helped train social workers to interview defective persons in mental institutions, hospitals for epileptics, prisons, orphanages, circus midways. In 1915, he called for the ultimate sterilization of the lowest ten percent of human stock.”

Collins notes that “Between 1910 and 1963, Iowa sterilized 1,910 persons.  In 1979 the Eugenics Board of Iowa was abolished.” 

Thorough in her research, Collins presents well documented facts. There is much historical racism she makes public again, such as two laws passed in Virginia including the state’s 1924 Racial Integrity Act, the most strict anti-miscegenation law in the country.

Her book details the horrors of the possible connections between American racism and the rise of Hitler and antisemitism in Germany including the concept of the “master race” and Aryan supremacy.

This is a book of great merit, not only for its scholarly research but also for the revelations either not known or forgotten by Americans. During this political season in which race – racism – is a focal point not only for the candidates, but for law enforcement and communities at large, Collins reminds us of more than a century of interracial ills which may help explain our current societal struggles.   This is a highly recommended book for those familiar with the conflicts of American race relations and enlightening for those who are not.

______________________________________
Zvi A. Sesling

Reviewer for Boston Small Press and Poetry Scene
Author, Fire Tongue (Cervena Barva, 2016)
Across Stones of Bad Dreams (Cervena Barva, 2011)
King of the Jungle (Ibbetson Press, 2010)
Editor, Muddy River Poetry Review
Publisher, Muddy River Books
Editor, Bagel Bards Anthologies 7& 8

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Sondheim Defines the Quality of Art in Huntington Theatre’s Production of “Sunday in the Park with George”



In Huntington Theatre’s “Sunday in the Park with George,” Adam Chanler-Berat as George Seurat exhibits laser-like focus inserting flecks of color in his painting. Photo Credit Paul Marotta



Sondheim Defines the Quality of Art in Huntington Theatres Production of Sunday in the Park with George
By Rosie Rosenzweig
Resident Scholar, Brandeis University Womens Studies Research Center
The Huntington theatre, recently saved from its demise, opens the 2016-2017 season with a smashing Broadway-quality production of Sondheims musical statement about the nature of art. The Pulitzer Prize-winning work, Sunday in the Park with George literally has the characters in GeorgeSeurat’s classic painting come to life and speak to the artist.  Artists interviewed by this reviewer confirm this process to be life-giving as they watch their own creations take on a life of their own.  The characters in this presentation constantly startle us by stepping out of the tableau, while the others remain frozen like statues, to comment on the theme, the actions, and their true feelings. 
 Lead actor Adam Chanler-Berat as George Seurat demonstrates this as he actually becomes the dog in this famous painting “A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte” set in 1884; in his laugh-out-loud performance, he barks, pants, and mimes the mannerisms of a dog presenting his stomach for a tummy rub.  In the second act set 100 years later, we see Georges great-grandson lost in the cloying courtship of sponsors for his trite light shows, and seeking inspiration for his next endeavor. Both scenes are full of humor, sight gags, and a serious search for true experience of Flow.
While the protagonist is ostensibly George Seurat, Sondheims themes are beyond just one artist: Essentially the grand character of art itself is the protagonist asking the age-old question: What exactly is true art?   Seurat states that visual art is design, composition, the balance of light and harmony.  Essentially, art brings order to chaos with harmony.
And this production demonstrates just that when the cacophony of simultaneous conversations and movement are directed by Seurat who moves characters and landscape into a lovely silent tableau with the just the right amount of light and color.  Every element joins into a silent ballet to a meditative serenity that is beautiful to behold. Act 2 enacts a different kind of ballad with the affected movements of the pretentious contemporary art scene and hilarious use of life-size cutouts.
 Chanler-Berat’s voice and mannerism demonstrate the artist’s intense autotelic process with brush strokes of Seurat’s Pointillism in counterpoint with his lover’s needs to Sondheim’s score which is actually Pointillism in music. Director Peter DuBois describes in more detail:
The music also tells the story; it is not just the lyrics. The melody, the rhythm, the tone are each a representation of the story he is unfolding before the audience. Sometimes the music creates a sense of irony between what is being sung and what is being felt. . .. Of course, it doesn’t hurt that he is one of the great geniuses of the 20th century. We are exploring the Bach or Mozart of our time — fearless as a composer and a perfectionist.
The musical explores the experience of Seurat’s revolutionary contribution combining scientific visual principles with his focused use of thousands of dots, allowing the viewer to combine them and make art with his or her own eyes.  That Seurat’s mistress was named Dot, is another tongue-in-cheek element of that art.
Lead actress Jenni Barber exhibits attention-grabbing presence, aplomb and perfect pitch in her role as George’s lover that she sometimes steals the show with her caricatured stances, body language and facial expressions.  Her eye-balling, pouts, and expressions are reminiscent of Lucille Ball, the queen of daytime TV laughter.
This production is the second of an ambitious plan to stage all 15 Stephen Sondheim musicals.  Huntington artistic director Peter DuBois explains his dizzying and profound experience working on a musical about artistic creation: “it’s about the act of creation and about artistic obsession—the highs and lows!”  He embodied the best of his art from the ballet of movement within the tableaus to Seurat’s concentrated flecking of light to the affected postures of the contemporary art scene in Act Two, where the entire cast showcased its versatility in its range of accents and body language.
Local actress Bobbie Steinbach, who plays George’s mother with gusto and attitude says that: “You see her one way early on, and very differently later.” She interprets the piece as really being about, “Sondheim himself and his own unresolved relationship with his mother.” After his father abandoned him when he was 10, he was subject to psychological abuse from his mother. Subsequently, he refused to attend her 1992 funeral.  
“Sunday in the Park with George”will play through until -October. 16at the Boston University Theatre, 264 Huntington Ave., Boston. For more information, call 617-266-0800; or go to huntingtontheatre.org