Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Interview with Novelist Margot Livesey

Interview conducted by Doug Holder


Margot Livesey




Margot Livesey has published six novels: Homework, Criminals, The Missing World, Eva Moves the Furniture, Banishing Verona and The House on Fortune Street. Her seventh novel, is The Flight of Gemma Hardy.

Margot has taught at Boston University, Bowdoin College, Brandeis University, Carnegie Mellon, Cleveland State, Emerson College, the Iowa Writers' Workshop, Tufts University, the University of California at Irvine, the Warren Wilson College MFA program for writers, and Williams College. She has been the recipient of fellowships from the Guggenheim Foundation, the N.E.A., the Massachusetts Artists' Foundation and the Canada Council for the Arts. Margot is currently a distinguished writer in residence at Emerson College. She lives with her husband, a painter, in Cambridge, MA, and goes back to London and Scotland whenever she can.

Alice Sebold says, "Every novel of Margot Livesey's is, for her readers, a joyous discovery. Her work radiates with compassion and intelligence and always, deliciously, mystery."

I had the pleasure to talk with her on my Somerville Community Access TV show " Poet to Poet Writer to Writer."

Doug Holder
:  How did the idea come about for your novel The Flight of Gemma Hardy?

Margot Livesey: If six years ago you told me that I was going to write a re-imagining of Jane Eyre—I would have sent you on your way to McLean Hospital.  It is hard enough to write a novel, much less in the shadow of a master. But I was part of a book club and we discussed Jane Eyre. It was a novel that I read when I was a mere 10 years old. I chose it because it had a girl’s name on the cover. And from the first pages I feel in love, and I also identified very much with Jane. She grew up in the Scottish moors, which seemed a lot like the Yorkshire moors where I grew up. I had a severe stepmother who seemed a bit like Jane’s cruel aunt. I also went to an all girl’s school—so I seemed to have a lot in common with Jane. Later I went on to teach the Jane Eyre. Then I found myself in this book club in Cambridge, Mass. And the room was filled with ardent readers who all loved Jane Eyre. I just started thinking about how amazing the book is.  It reaches all kinds, all ages, and nationalities. I started to think what would it be like to tell the story in more modern times—about a girl who finds herself without parents, and who has to make her own way in the world. I thought about setting the novel in 2000 or 2005. But I wanted the novel to take place before that great wave of feminism. Even though a great deal of the novel takes place in the 60s—it doesn’t feel like the “Swinging Sixties.” It is a very old fashioned story.

DH: Are you an old fashioned novelist?

ML: I do love a good plot. I grew up reading those great Victorian novels. I love what plot can do for a novel. Readers still love a great story.

DH: You weaved in Icelandic sagas in this book—why?

ML: I thought it was very important that my main character Gemma was very different from Jane Eyre. So I decided to give her a very different family background. I tried to find a country near Scotland that had a strong connection to Scotland. I traveled to Iceland. Iceland has a remarkable landscape—the island is still full of active volcanoes. When you actually see a field of green—you gasp—because much of the island is black, volcanic rock. There is all this wild beauty there.

DH: Throughout this novel, the main character has a strong connection to birds. What is your relationship to birds?

ML: I think my relationship to birds is a very positive one. My father was 50 when I was born. He was an elderly 50—and one of the things we did together was bird watch.  He taught me all about the Scottish birds, and I still recognize them instinctively. I never lost that interest with birds and that feeling that they are visitors from another world, as well as from this one, stay with me.

DH: Did your experience in a boarding school parallel that of Gemma’s?

ML: My father taught at a boy’s boarding school—my mother was the school nurse. The school my father taught at always seemed like a benign institution. Girls were forbidden there. I was sent to a girl’s school which I thought was anything but benign. I spent my years there praying that the school would close down, and eventually it did. And like my novel, there was that sense of class division and privilege among the girls there.

DH: The characters of George and Donaldson are both infirm old men, who Gemma has a sort of relationship with. Donaldson was lost in the haze of dementia, but came out of his haze to give Genna  his keen insight. George, who was very ill and out of it, came through in the clinch as well.

ML: In the case of Mr. Donaldson and Alzheimer's, a family member of mine had Alzheimer's disease and for a number of years I visited her. And there were these wonderful moments when she was clearheaded and had these piercing insights. So—Donaldson was part of my experience. And of course we always get wonderful perceptions from the elderly.

DH: Sinclair was a worldly and much older man than Genna. It seemed she was an unlikely match for this gentleman.

ML: I wanted to be faithful to the plot of Jane Eyre. I had to come up with a plausible version of Mr. Rochester. I thought the real interesting question was why this man would be interested in this young woman, rather than a woman of his own class and intellect.

DH: You are a Writer-in-residence at Emerson College in Boston. How does that work for you?

ML: I like it and I find it a challenge. I try to help the students find their material and I help them shape it. It is hard, but at the end of the semester I have learned as much or more that they have.

DH: Your husband is an artist. Does your work inform his and does his work inform yours?

ML: I wish that I can say my novels were like his beautiful paintings. I learn from his dedication, his vision, and his motivation.

DH: Do you have another novel in the making?

ML: I am trying to write a novel set in contemporary New England. It is a challenge to write about these American characters, behaving badly. I can’t write about the academic community because I would wind up losing all my friends.

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

The Natural Light in Mary Buchinger’s new book of Poetry, Aerialist


 
Mary Buchinger Bodwell







The Natural Light in Mary Buchinger’s new book of Poetry, Aerialist

article by Michael Todd Steffen

To be or not to be referential and scholarly about one’s poetry, that may be one frequent question
in the air,” what with the Internet and all of the world’s information at our fingertips and at the mercy of our cut and paste tools, about how we bring the language of others’ writing into our own writing. The Modernist critic Hugh Kenner wrote somewhere that writing is mostly quoting. This was one of the points the major Modernists like Pound, Joyce and Eliot were making by using direct quotes in their texts from world class authors, from the Book of Ecclesiastes and Virgil to Flaubert and Baudelaire. Pound and Joyce left their works largely without annotation for the harvest of careful readers and scholars. More doubtful about how public his references were, Eliot wrote the famous notes to The Waste Land, which (instead of putting matters to rest about the references in his poem) only inspired more scholarly debate.

Mary Buchinger’s new book of poems is wonderfully titled Aerialist (ISBN 13:978-0-692-34196-6 Gold Wake Press, Boston, 2015) and one immediate feature of it is the evocation of major authors like Virginia Woolf, Borges, Proust, Calvino as well as of artistic oeuvres and objets, Titian’s “The Rape or Rapture of Europa,” Brueghel’s “The Fall of Icarus” (via Auden’s poem “Musée de Beaux Arts) and even a “Magnificat” which “describes the sculpture PixCell-Elk#2 by Kohei Nawa” (c.f. reference notes in the back pages of the book).

My first impression was that the quotes loomed over the poems. They were too ponderous for the appreciably local and modest themes treated in Buchinger’s poetry. But this impression changed as
I spent more time with the book, allowing the more reticent, metaphysical suggestions in the poems
to emerge. The quotes began to amplify and resonate. I like the passage from Borges’s A New Refutation of Time too much not to share it again:

Time is a river that sweeps me along, but I am the river; it is a tiger
that mangles me, but I am the tiger; it is a fire that consumes me,
but I am the fire. The world, unfortunately, is real; I, unfortunately,
am Borges.

If we get what Borges is saying, Buchinger’s poetry burns at a light perhaps closer to equal with the real world’s light. There is less “unfortunately” to be admitted between the poems in Aerialist and the world outside our windows. Yet the poems by Buchinger still have the charm and punch to furrow our brows with pleasure and concern. Her meanings are at times drawn so vividly as to become physical or spatial rather than rational. Her metaphors do what art does best, putting us in the embodiment of an epiphany or special meaning. What was it to be a child in the comfort of home?

Childhood, that nest

of gathered, broken sticks,
bark half-peeled, magic wands, lightning rods…

the slight and airy edges of this messy assembly

so close to heaven and all its wishing stars, a fall, so far.
(page 20)


The narrative arc of the book as a whole makes a lot of sense and offers congruities. In the opening poem “a bird flies all pink pink air”—nothing more precise than “a bird” and in the brief glimpse with a series of verbs—“touches, enters and is lost”—the poem’s one noun vanishes from sight like Wallace Stevens’ blackbird, evoking the wake of an appearance rather than the appearance itself. Did we see this bird or not? Was it even there? This is an overture, a real attention-grabber. To make the thing disappear before we have a clear look at it.

With a sense of symmetry and satisfaction we come to the final poem to find animals in more vivid definition, in a setting more stabilized, though this is still our mortal world of triumphs and perils:

On the river’s edge

geese float like speckled seeds.
Later, they will sprout wings, leave
the naked frogs tumbling in the current.

The geese sip air and water alike, press against
the liquids, they too feel the ice
in the upper sky… (page 107)


For T.S. Eliot, Between the conception And creation Falls the shadow. For Buchinger there fall a hundred more pages of sustaining variety, always the melodic, slightly playful intonations and earnest moments, questions and silences, an aerialist getting up on a train to use the hand straps for a brief twirl and saut, jewelry purchased from a Middle Easterner, the suggestion of an illness, more birds, the kids… The world is real…the poet is…Mary Buchinger.

This evening Mary Buchinger will be featured reading at the First and Last Word Poetry Reading Series hosted by Harris Gardner at the Center For The Arts, at the Armory, in the café at 191 Highland Avenue, Somerville, MA. Philip E. Burnam, Ruth Chad and Ruth Smullins will also be reading. $4 cover, and open mic.

Saturday, May 16, 2015

Somerville’s Mary Alexandra Agner: A Potent Mix of the Poetic and Scientific.







Mary Alexandra Agner

 

Somerville’s Mary Alexandra Agner: A Potent Mix of the Poetic and Scientific.

By Doug Holder

Mary Alexandra Agner met me at my usual corner at the Bloc 11 Café in Union Square to discuss her career in science, writing and poetry. Agner moved to Somerville in 1997, and told me that her first poetry publication was in Somerville’s Ibbetson Street magazine. Agner earned a degree from MIT and an MFA at Emerson College in Boston. At Emerson she studied with the late, great, and very eccentric poet Bill Knott. Agner said of Knott: “He was very influential and was very willing to work with me and other students. In fact Knott blurbed her first collection of poetry: “Doors of the Body.”

Agner's latest venture is “Science News in Verse’ This project is hosted by PATREON, a crowd funding Internet site. People donate money on a monthly basis, and in return Agner writes verse concerning the latest science news. For instance, a recent poem that she composed was based on some fossils at a Yale University museum that were mislabeled as birds.  Later they were  found out to be dinosaurs.  From this tidbit Agner was able to mine a poem about dinosaurs at sea. In the era of the dinosaur, the area we now call Kansas was largely a body of water, thus the dinosaurs at sea theme. Agner reflected: “It is a joy to put science to verse. Through this genre, it helps people become interested in science.”

Agner also has a column titled “Failing the Finkbeiner” (based on a test) that champions the recent accomplishments of woman scientists. Agner told me” Although women have made strides in the past decades, there is still much discrimination, and much work to be done. My friends and I all have experienced discrimination in one form or the other.” The idea for “Failing….” started with an obituary in the New York Times of a prominent rocket scientist, Yvonne Brill. The obit started out (according to Agner), with a lead sentence that referred how this top shelf scientist made great lasagna. Understandably, a lot of women scientists and women in general, were upset with this. Agner said, “This gave me the idea of how we can write about a female scientist without mentioning her cooking or kids. I decided to write reports on women scientists that didn’t focus on the fact that they are women, but that they are scientists with important work and accomplishments.

Agner told me she left the software industry to freelance as a writer. “It is a tough way to make a living, but I am making my way.’ But like any start-up, it takes time to take root and grow. In the meantime this industrious Somervellian will turn out poems and articles on a consistent basis. Agner finished her java, and left my nook, undoubtedly swept up by the street of the—Paris of New England.

Here's the link to Agner's website  https://www.patreon.com/sciencenewsinverse

---

Keeper of the Skies
by Mary Alexandra Agner

Brian Marsden, 1937-2010 (http://www.latimes.com/news/custom/scimedemail/la-me-brian-marsden-20101120,0,6000662.story)

Celestial mechanic, comet-tamer
calming gas jets, stalker of debris,
another Mitchell building orbitology
from logarithms calc-ed longhand and frames
(or plates) of captured photons which were blamed
when their reflector’s planned trajectory
intersected Earth’s geometry.
He was our herald of the outer flame.

Relinquish, solar system, all that light
can share: revisit times, those ancient berths
of rock and gas which elude human sight---
to Brian Marsden, who catalogued your worth.
Flare up your lamp! And set your ice to flight!
For he has gone and nothing fills the dearth.
( Previously published in The Flea)





I Forgot Light Burns By Eileen R. Tabios



Poet Eileen R. Tabios








I Forgot Light Burns
By Eileen R. Tabios
Copyright 2015 by Eileen R. Tabios
Moria Books
Munster, NY
ISBN-13: 978-0-96473912121-3-2
Softbound, 56 pages, $16

Review by Zvi A. Sesling

In much the same way as some scientists are developing artificial intelligence, robots and the future, Eileen R. Tabios brings us to the future with her new book I Forgot Light Burns.

In the publicity piece enclosed with the book there are quotes from her Afterword in which Ms. Tabios states, “My recent work, ‘Murder, Death and Resurrection’ (MDR) includes an MDR Poetry Generator that brings together much of my poetics and poet tics.  The MDR Poetry Generator contains a data base of 1,146 lines which can be combined randomly to make a large number of poems; the shortest would be a couplet and longest would be a poem of 1,146 lines…”

“The MDR Poetry Generator’s conceit is that any combination of its 1,146 lines succeed in creating a poem.  Thus, I can create—generate—new poems unthinkingly from its database.”

Create poetry unthinkingly?  Is that poetry?  I had always thought one must think in order to write (create) poetry.  Cogito Ergo Sum.   However, she notes, “Yet while the MDR Poetry Generator presents poems not generated through conscious personal preferences, the results are not distanced from the author:  I created the 1,1146 lines from reading through 27 previously-published poetry collections…these new poems nonetheless contain all the personal involvement—and love!—that went into the writing of its lines.  The results dislocate without eliminating authorship.”

So, while some poets may find it easier, if they have the Tabios MDR Poetry Generator and take the time to enter 1,146 (or more or less?) lines, I am sure her efforts are not an overnight creation, but a long creative process culminating in this inspirational invention.

Here are some poems from this fascinating book, which only expand Ms. Tabios’s reputation as one of the most creative abstract poets in the country:

I forgot I was a connoisseur of alleys—

I forgot the glint from the fang of a wild boar as
he lurked behind shadows in a land where it
only takes one domino to fall—

I forgot how quickly civilization can disappear,
as swiftly as the shoreline from an oil spill
birthed from a twist of the wrist by a drunk
vomiting over the helm—

I forgot grabbing at my fading dreams only to
recall a vision of skyscrapers crumbling from
the slaps of iron balls—

However it works, the Poetry Generator generated an exciting poem that made me want to read on.  The next one that “grabbed” me was:

I forgot the light burned and we never shared
our eyes—

This simple poem I read three or four times to fully absorb it from different perspectives and ended up wishing I had thought of that line.

I don’t remember any titles on these interesting  poems. However, many of the poems are worth remembering. Take for example the following poem, or is three separate poems?

I forgot memory contains an underbrush—

I forgot the inevitability of ashes—

I forgot sentences like veins—

The final example in this book I will use is one that while it takes place in her native Philippines, could be in any city on any continent and holds truths to which many of us a blind.

I forgot I saw a city bleeding beyond the
window and felt Manila’s infamously red sunset
staining street children whose hopes
concerned absolutely no one—

After reading the publicity piece which is extracted from the Afterword, I find myself enthralled with the poetic creations in this volume of poetry.  The result I am sure is that this is poetry – all of it worth reading. It would be interesting to see the next volume created by the MDR Poetry Generator.  Yet I hope Ms. Tabios, who is light years ahead of 99.99% of poets, does not share her auto-generating poetic system and allows us mere mortals to continue serving up our own poetry.  At the same time we are seeing the poetry of the 21st century and beyond; for once begun, it can only move forward, which  makes this book a must for the creative mind.

______________________________________________________________________

Zvi A. Sesling is author of King of the Jungle (Ibbetson Street, 2010), Across Stones of  Bad Dreams (Cervena Barva, 2011) and the soon to be published Fire Tongue (Cervena Barva). He is Editor of Muddy River Poetry Review, Publishes Muddy River Books and edited Bagel Bards Anthologies #7 and #8.

Thursday, May 14, 2015

Leeram in Fordlandia by Buell Hollister





Leeram in Fordlandia
by Buell Hollister


Reviewed by Alice Weiss

At the center of Buell Hollister’s novel, Leeram in Fordlandia, is a dies ex machine in the form of an Amazonian shrunken head that comes into the hands of its possessor, a middle-aged ne’er do well Brookline resident, Gilbert Greenbush, quite by chance and who manages to transform Greenbush’s life of boredom, diffidence, and loneliness, into one of adventure, confidence, and geniality, even romance. The way through to these appealing transformations is a kind of reverse fairy tale, where our hero is taken into what would have been the wilds of the Amazonian rain forest except the Ford Motor Company got there first, and built many years before, what is now an abandoned rubber plantation, where local workers were exploited and the environment abused.

The narrator’s voice is first person, slangy, cynical, even clueless. As the central character in the story, though, he begins to discover that he can operate in a new world. It is a dream we all have, at least I do, some fairy god-person takes us someplace new which looks rather like the old world we actually live in but we are transformed into capable respected adults. Well that’s what happens to Greenbush. The trip of the book, and I mean that in the broadest sense, is how Leeeram maneuvers him into capability success, and maintains it for him. On the way Greenbush discovers an appealing woman, Lisa, and a forceful and competent friend of hers, Suxie, (deliberately not sexy I suppose with underlying hints of sucky) a child of Amazonian immigrants, who luckily steals the head, and begins them on the journey to resurrect the town of Fordlandia, and everyone else in the nearby villages. Ultimately included in the journey are human helpers, among them two professors, knowledgeable about a special kind of crop which also incidentally goes some way toward solving the problem of world hunger and who also have useful connections to the U.S.Department of Agriculture . My favorites are two researchers, Ben and Seth, computer and biologically savvy, who ultimately figure out how to get hook up a certain kind of jungle grass to batteries which literally electrify Fordlandia and the surrounding villages and towns. The technique is to use the electricity generated by an intervention in the process of photosynthesis. It seems to me a delightful answer to obtaining power from a renewable resource, our lawns. 

The engine of all this is a interface with the afterlife provided by Leeram who it turns out is not just a genie. Instead he has a muscular connection to an afterlife so vast that it contains everybody he needs to see. One would have to go back to the Greeks to imagine an afterlife so afflicted with the sins and pressures of this world. Two of the interesting “wormholes” into that source of consultancy, are the grave of Suxie’s grandfather who returns with an understanding of the powers of jungle flora, as well as live memories of the Ford plant operations. Which leads me to my favorite part of the book. Henry Ford comes back as a river dolphin, and more remarkably, a liberal. He has to be keep in a water cage in order to, well stay alive and advise the often hapless but well meaning missionaries of capitalism, that people this book. With its unexpected discoveries and sometimes hilarious solutions, this book is a romp.

Monday, May 11, 2015

Sam Cornish, Doug Holder in a Huddle.

(Left to Right)  Poet Sam Cornish and Doug Holder.
 photo courtesy of Glenn Bowie
   ..... Examining Holder's new collection Portrait of an Artist as a Young: Poseur 1973 to 1984 ( Big Table Publishing), at the opening  of the Newton Writing and Publishing Center. ( May 9, 2015)

Sunday, May 10, 2015

Coring the Moon Selected Poems by Kenneth Frost




 
Coring the Moon
Selected Poems by Kenneth Frost
Main Street Rag Publishing Company
Charlotte, North Carolina
www.mainstreetrag.com
ISBN: 978-1-59948-482-2
232 Pages
$15.00

Review by Dennis Daly

“The shining outlasts its day, “says poet Kenneth Frost in the last poem of this intriguing, posthumous collection.  Indeed it does. Frost’s life work hypnotizes with its dazzling mixture of surreal and natural imagery. His titles cry out specificity while his stanzas court universality.

Arrayed before us as a virtual archipelago of totem-like short poems, these selected pieces belie their presumably explosive birth with an elegance of light and dazzle. Each image connects seamlessly with their contextual whole in an artistic logic unique to this poet.

Early in the book Frost replicates the cold-blooded passion and insidious obsession of a protagonist bent on mayhem. He conveys an interlude of evil and introversion this way,

Angels could tell me how it feels
spending my life crawling between
the zoomlens of a reptile’s eye
and a spotlight heating up
confessions in a surgical
tube that a doctor wants to stick
everywhere.
        I wonder if
A mugger carries a good luck
animal in the zoo cage
of his lead pipe, rattling
his witch doctor’s spaceship
into the storm that he creates
and whether bums and rats pass in
and out of one another, one
with their underground highway.
A dead slave could tell, but won’t.
Neither will this telescopic sight.

Poets appear as peeping toms and escapees from shipwrecks peering into the portholes of the doomed passengers, living their lives as outsiders and observers in Frost’s poem Window-Washer. These spectators struggle with both the drudgery of their artistic lives as well as the by-product of self-knowledge that they’ve collected as part of their creative routine. I like this poem a lot. The poet concludes by reflecting on the nature of fame,

I concentrate
on soaping up
and shining glass
so the roulette
wheel of sunlight
won’t skid my head
around its track.
As I move down,
sideway and down,
I read my life
In the headlines
My printing press
Is slapping out:
“They didn’t know
That he was there
Till he was not.”

Visible only if you look closely, the tides of man’s nature alter in the fullness of the moon. Frost’s title poem, Coring the Moon, focuses on the dark creatures inhabiting earth’s singular satellite and their inextricable relationship with consciousness and wonder. Although the poetic style is much different, there is more than an echo of Allen Ginsberg’s Howl here. Frost speculates on mortality and madness,

… they fall into a trap,
a black hole, or nothing?
Coyotes run in circles,
Mad for the nothing of the moon.
They try on their ghosts
In the moon’s dressing room
Owls become raucous
And tear their spirits limb from limb.
The hole passes with a long howl…

Two strange poems juxtaposed with one another are Louis Armstrong and Whirling Perfume. Both mix and match different senses with surreal images. In Louis Armstrong you smell a garden’s perfume in the trumpeter’ notes and visualize a woman’s beauty. Listen to Frost’s second stanza,

How beautiful
the red-gold hair
Helen shakes
in the high notes
to wake perfume’s
transparent garden
into doorways’
magnetic light.

Whirling Perfume goes even further. It conjures up wolves as they might appear in Eden or the environs of Assisi. The poet puts it this way,

…lilac fragrance
blanketing the air,
almost choking it
in revelation’s
whirling perfume,
heart’s wolves
circling—no, not
amber-eyed
animals, sight
clear as crystal balls
where you could read
Saint Francis
in their trance,
but high-pitched,
prophetic laughter.

Sensuality does not prepare mere mortals for the brutishness of worldly affairs. Man’s belief systems, religious or not, depend on a bit of luck for life to mean something and for goodness to attain independent significance and status. The poem Fallout Dreams deals with these philosophical considerations,

In the funhouse of the sensorium
I juggle pins
To entertain the source

with my humility.
See the light multiply, converge,
freeze

me  in its maximum security
courtyard.
I hang on to the rising

rabbit’s foot

Looking at the aged world decked out in its most lavish attire can be quite daunting. The poet’s persona, in the poem Autumn, Maine, stands knee-deep in a pond and reflects on the preciousness of the world he has known. The images here seem to be more anchored, more brisk. Notice also that here, as in many of these pieces, the sun glitters up at the reader from a reflecting source. The shifting gears of a truck suggest a change of perception. Frost spins out the ending wonderfully,

His knees stand on
the water’s light.
Echoes spin
the compasses
of shouts till they
willy-willy
on this outback,
stuttering
ghosts of the heart.
On the lodge road
a truck shifts gears.
Raising his arms
above his head,
he dives into
sap welling up
a crystal cave,
swims out and back

Each of Frost’s poems set in this selected archipelago of passion and elegance sings out a cataract of lightness and ecstatic breath which spreads over and beyond the earth’s pedestrian topology—a fitting tribute for a consummate poet.

Friday, May 08, 2015

The Hastings Room First Church Congregationalist an e v e n i n g o f p o e t r y Monday May 11, 7:00pm

The Hastings Room
First Church Congregationalist
11 Garden Street
near Harvard Square

a n   e v e n i n g   o f  p o e t r y
      Monday May 11, 7:00pm


Louise C. Callaghan




Praised by Ireland’s leading literary critics… “a beautifully simple and familiar symmetry… Callaghan’s voice is both aural and visual. In word-choice, cadence and line-break there is no sense of straining for effect…delicate and at times deceptively fragile poems…” – Niall MacMonagle.

“…the edge of humor, the understatement, luminously brilliant observation, and the intellectual honesty…”  – Macdara Woods

Author of three volumes of poetry, Louise C. Callaghan was born in Shankill, Co. Dublin.  She edited a poetry anthology called Forgotten Light, which presents poems centered on the subject of memory (the proceeds of the book support The Alzheimer Society of Ireland).  Callaghan’s books of poetry are The Puzzle-Heart (1999), Remember the Birds (2005), and In the Ninth House (2010), all published by Salmon Poetry.

  






Denise Bergman


Denise Bergman has published three books of poetry: A Woman in Pieces Crossed a Sea, winner of the Patricia Clark Smith Poetry Prize (West End Press, June 2014); The Telling, a book-length poem, (Cervena Barva Press, January 2014); and Seeing Annie Sullivan, poems based on the early life of Helen Keller’s teacher (Cedar Hill Books), translated into Braille and a Talking Book. She has been a Split This Rock Poet of the Week and her poetry is widely published. Denise conceived and edited the anthology of urban poetry City River of Voices (West End Press). 

Monday, May 04, 2015

Fame Written on Water and Engraved in Stone: John Keats by Karen Alkalay-Gut

Photo by  Ezra Gut


**** My friend Professor Emerita  Karen Alkalay -Gut (Tel Aviv University) has kindly sent me a series of articles about poets and their graves that she recently completed. She has accompanied each article with photos--I hope to add more--as I have time. I became acquainted with her work when I was a guest and judge for Voices Israel. I had the pleasure to lecture and run workshops in Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and elsewhere.



Fame Written on Water and Engraved in Stone: John Keats

By  Karen Alkalay -Gut


John Keats is most probably the most popular poet in the English language, and for almost 200 years his grave has been the most visited of any English poet.  However, his life and death were far from poetic and his grave, perhaps the first to become a site for pilgrims, was designed by him to be totally anonymous. 

When Keats was 21, in 1817, when his poetic career was beginning to bloom, Keats was full of promise and optimism.  He had decided to give up his very successful medical studies for a career of poetry. Even the negative criticism he received for being one of the first of the English poets to be lacking a traditional education in the classics at an appropriate university did not seem to deter him.  He was reaching far beyond the contemporary concept of poetry, and his irregular background and his original imagination in conceiving the definition of poetry, allowed him to imagine a different future for poetry – his own as well as that of poetry in general.  His poems showed the promise of something eternal.

From this first optimism, the way to his sad grave in the non-Catholic cemetery in Rome was swift and direct.  At the age of twenty-five, impoverished, far from home and far from his beloved Fanny Brawne, Keats died in terrible and extended agonies in his exiled flat on the Plaza de Espagna.
Perhaps some of his agonies might have been postponed, alleviated, and redirected had he chosen a different path, a different friend or different doctors, or at least different legal counsel.

But he was ultimately alone and powerless in his decisions.  Orphaned at an early age, first by his father when he was nine and then by his mother when he was fourteen, Keats seemed on the way to recovering from his misfortunes when he  successfully completed his license in Apothecary and was on his way to becoming a surgeon.  The poetic muse that overtook him might have also found a niche in his life had he known there were two accounts held for him until his 21st birthday totaling almost 9 thousand pounds (now worth almost 400,000 pounds today).  He could have easily sustained himself as a full-time poet, instead of struggling to stay out of debt.  (But neither his guardian nor his mother’s lawyer mentioned the money to him). Keats’ final will to his friends contained instructions to pay back his debts to them, and if there was money left over, to pay his tailor.  Except for books, there were no worldly goods.  So his choice to completely abandon his medical career for a life of poetry was one of conscious  (and unnecessary) poverty.  Yet poverty and consumption suited the image of the poet.  Shelly wrote to Keats the year before, “This consumption is a disease particularly fond of people who write such good verses as you have done…”

Perhaps had he been more of a doctor and less of a poet, he might have been more active in seeking remission.  One wonders whether the best doctors or the best sanitariums might have prolonged his life, or at least eased his descent into an agonized death.  But when he coughed his first blood in London he recognized the fate of his mother and his brother, and did not seek a more innovative cure.
Had he not listened to his physicians and left England for Rome for what he knew was a futile attempt at improving his health, it may be he would not have died as quickly and as painfully  as he did.  His doctor and his friend in Rome, Joseph Severn, seemed to love him to death.  At first Dr. James Clark, his Roman-British physician, diagnosed him with "mental exertion."  Later Clark understood it was tuberculosis and prescribed a daily diet of one anchovy and a piece of bread, accompanied by frequent bleedings. 

Had Keats been accompanied by a more experienced nurse, and not just his friend, Joseph Severn, who happened to be available and willing, but extremely uninformed about nursing, he may have had an easier time of it.  Severn, a successful painter with a sunny and optimistic personality, followed the Doctor’s instructions carefully, but seems to have been at a loss as to how to take care of him.  Although he washed him, read to him, changed his clothes, and painted and wrote about Keats, he refused to hand over the laudanum Keats had purchased before he left England, fearing Keats would use it to commit suicide. Had Severn followed Keats’ instructions, the laudanum may have eased the cough and slowed down the destruction of his lungs.  It certainly would have eased his way into death.


Perhaps Keats’ worst mistake was in relinquishing his love.  In romantic fiction the boy gets the girl; in the real-life story of John Keats and Fanny Brawne there was no such happy ending. Although they were secretly engaged, Keats' inability to support Brawne and his ill health meant the relationship was doomed. By the time the poet arrived in Rome Keats was filled with regrets at their parting. "I should have had her when I was in health," he wrote in one letter to a friend, "and I should have remained well." Too weak to read her letters in Rome, he asked that they be placed in his shroud near his heart.


Fortunately, what Keats called his “posthumous existence” lasted only a few months after his arrival, John Keats died in Rome on the night of February 23 of 1821. The funeral procession of half a dozen friends bearing his wasted body left from his apartment in the Piazza di Spagna, and arrived at dawn where he was buried in the corner of the pastoral non-catholic cemetery. 

But the true romance in the story was not that he would die, but that he would leave nothing physical behind him, and, in this manner would ascend into eternity.  He would become ‘pure’ art.  Perhaps he had in mind his Grecian urn in which the lovers are forever in the perfect moment when they are about to kiss.  Perhaps he had in mind the ending of his poem, “The Eve of St. Agnes” where love cannot be fulfilled in life, but the lovers themselves manage to escape the real world of pain and hatred, and rise beyond the world of transience.  In so many of his poems he was separating from life even before he knew he was dying, and in Rome, when it was clear he would not recover, wrote,  I have an habitual feeling of my real life having past, and that I am leading a posthumous existence"
Because the desire to transcend life, to transform the self into pure art seems to be the goal of many of Keats’ final poems, it is not surprising that Keats asked that his grave would carry the inscription, “Here lies one whose name was writ on water." 


This inscription is not modesty but a kind of perfection.  In February of 1818 Keats had written about the aims of poetry to John Reynolds, “How beautiful are the retired flowers! how would they lose their beauty were they to throng into the highway crying out, ‘admire me I am a violet! dote upon me I am a primrose! “  Perfect beauty is distilled into its pure form, Keats thought.  This concept is explained further in a letter to Richard Woodhouse on October 27, of the same year.  He speaks about what he calls, “the poetical Character”  it is not itself - it has no self - it is every thing and nothing - It has no character…A Poet is the most unpoetical of any thing in existence; because he has no Identity - he is continually in for - and filling some other Body - The Sun, the Moon, the Sea and Men and Women who are creatures of impulse are poetical and have about them an unchangeable attribute - the poet has none; no identity - he is certainly the most unpoetical of all God's Creatures.”
Percy Bysche Shelley understood this.  In the elegy he wrote only seven weeks after Keats’ death, “Adonais,” Shelley wrote:

XXXIX
       Peace, peace! he is not dead, he doth not sleep,
       He hath awaken'd from the dream of life;
       'Tis we, who lost in stormy visions, keep
       With phantoms an unprofitable strife,
       And in mad trance, strike with our spirit's knife
       Invulnerable nothings. We decay
       Like corpses in a charnel; fear and grief
       Convulse us and consume us day by day,
And cold hopes swarm like worms within our living clay.

Although Shelley had not been to Keats’ grave, he had been at the cemetery months before, when his own infant son was laid there to rest, a few feet away from where Keats would be buried. But the instructions of Shelley to go to the cemetery at Rome helped to begin a pilgrimage that hasn’t ended.
Joseph Severn knew there would be visitors at the grave and struggled with the instructions Keats had given him to leave his name off the tombstone.  Severn had visited the cemetery before Keats died and pleased the poet with the report that it was a beautiful spot, covered with violets and visited by sheep and shepherds, a perfect poetic place to disappear.  But Severn was an artist who believed in success, and had himself just won a great prize before he took on the role of nurse to Keats, and was hoping on this trip to win a Royal Academy traveling fellowship. (He succeeded in this, and other awards, including the British Consulship to Rome). After Keats’ death it was impossible for Severn to release his charge to such anonymity.  Having raised the funds for Keats’ monument, in the winter of 1823, Severn and Keats’ friend Charles Brown placed their addition that would mediate the devastating lines. "This Grave / contains all that was Mortal / of a / YOUNG ENGLISH POET / Who / on his Death Bed,/ in the Bitterness of his Heart / at the Malicious Power of his Enemies / Desired / these Words to be / engraven on his Tomb Stone: / Here lies One / Whose Name was writ in Water./ 24 February 1821." The date is accurate by Roman standards, who would count the days from evening to evening, but the rest was Brown’s idea, and seemed not only to mediate Keats’ longed-for lines but to minimize the poet’s personality.  Lord Byron noted that discrepancy between the great poet and the petty epitaph:

'Tis strange the mind, that very fiery particle
Should let itself be snuffed out by an article.
(canto 2, stanza 60)

The reason for Severn and Brown’s intervention was the universal disdain of Keats and his work, and Severn soon began hearing that his critics were adding to “here lies one whose name was write in water” the phrase “and his works in milk and water…”  The result of this intervention, however, was to help transform Keats from a relatively unknown poet to the emblematic Romantic Poet.  Severn’s numerous paintings, books and letters concerning Keats’ dying, including one painted in the year of Severn’s death, 1879, helped to keep Keats’ legend alive. 

Shelley’s “Adonais” may have initiated the concept of pilgrimage to the graves with the lines
XLVIII
       Or go to Rome, which is the sepulchre,
       Oh, not of him, but of our joy: 'tis nought
       That ages, empires and religions there
       Lie buried in the ravage they have wrought;
       For such as he can lend—they borrow not
       Glory from those who made the world their prey;
       And he is gather'd to the kings of thought
       Who wag'd contention with their time's decay,
And of the past are all that cannot pass away.

XLIX
       Go thou to Rome—at once the Paradise,
       The grave, the city, and the wilderness;
       And where its wrecks like shatter'd mountains rise,
       And flowering weeds, and fragrant copses dress
       The bones of Desolation's nakedness
       Pass, till the spirit of the spot shall lead
       Thy footsteps to a slope of green access
       Where, like an infant's smile, over the dead
A light of laughing flowers along the grass is spread;

But it was Severn who made the grave one not of transcendence but of tragedy, a tragedy that later poets identified with. 

Any visitor to Keats’ grave cannot help but note the fact that Joseph Severn also makes his own presence known.  Like a fan who becomes famous by being photographed with a star, Severn seems to be everywhere in the picture.  The tiny grave of Severn’s son, placed strategically next to Keats’ notes: Here Also Are Interred/the remains of/Arthur Severn/the infant son of/Joseph Severn who was born 22, Nov 1836 and accidentally killed /13 July 1837. The poet Wordsworth was present at his baptism in Rome.”  The well-loved eight-month old infant had died in his crib in a terrible accident that shattered the family, but his grave highlights the important christening guest.  Moreover, the grave is placed in a perfect position just behind and between the matching graves of Keats and Severn, who died 58 years after Keats.  The appearance is of a family, even though Severn was a happy husband and father with many children. Severn’s grave, which matches that of Keats’ poetic lyre (apparently requested by Keats) with the emblem of an artist, is careful to add the details necessary to promote the grave of Keats as well as himself.  It reads: To the memory of Joseph Severn/Devoted friend and deathbed companion /of/John Keats/Whom he lived to see/Numbered among/The immortal poets of England//And artist eminent for his representations /Of Italian life and literature/British Counsel at Rome from 1861-1872/And officer of the Crown of Italy/In recognition of his services/To freedom and Humanity/Died 3 August 1879, age 8.

 On the back of Severn’s grave is the list of distinguished sponsors for the gravesite.   Severn was to remain in Rome for twenty years, become the center of the English community and a well-connected man in his own right.  His friends included John Ruskin, Walter Scott, William Wordsworth, John Turner, Samuel Palmer, Leigh Hunt, Mary Shelley, and he also enjoyed a rich family life. Nevertheless Severn always acknowledged, “I owe almost everything to him, my best friends as well as my artistic prosperity, my general happiness as well as my best inspirations.”  Keats’ career owes a great deal to Severn as well.

"A Man's Life of any worth is a continual allegory--and very few eyes can see the Mystery of his life," wrote Keats to his brother George in the spring of 1819, as if forseeing the ways in which the understanding of his life and death would change according to the viewer. 

Resting near the very visible pyramid of Caius Cestius, Keats’ grave is easily found, and a plaster plaque on the wall as well as a bench with lines of Keats’ poem makes this place a quiet and meditative sanctuary for tourists.  In the coming years almost every significant poet would visit his grave and write a poem about it.  Keats’ grave has become the place to identify the anonymity of a poet’s life, the fears of being forgotten as a poet, as well as mortality.
It was Severn who enabled Keats to fulfill the destiny he had asked for in his sonnet, “On Sitting Down to Read King Lear Once Again,” “But when I am consumed in the fire,/  give me new phoenix wings to fly to my desire.”

Sunday, May 03, 2015

Scenes from an Adultery by Ronan Noone Directed by Bridget Kathleen O’Leary New Repertory Theatre









Scenes from an Adultery
 by Ronan Noone
Directed by Bridget Kathleen O’Leary
New Repertory Theatre

It seems impossible that anyone could come up with a fresh take on adultery, the subject of uncountable short stories, novels, movies, television shows, and plays. But how about a play on adultery where the adulterous couple never appears on stage? By focusing on the collateral damage that adultery has on the friends of those who stray, Irish playwright Ronan Noone (now on the theatre department faculty at Boston University) does give us something new to think about.

It’s probably more accurate to say friends who may have strayed, because for a good part of Scenes from an Adultery we’re not quite certain who in the couple in question, Dean and Corrine, has actually done what. All we hear are what little the characters—Tony (Peter Stray), his best friend Gasper (Cirian Crawford), and his wife Lisa (Leda Uberbacher), all 40-somethings—have seen or heard, and what they have or haven’t told each other about what they’ve seen and heard. In fact, if the title weren’t already taken, the play could have been called Secrets and Lies.

It all starts with Gasper telling Tony that he saw Corrine cozying up to a man not her husband in the park. They discuss whether or not she’s really having an affair and if they should tell Dean, who is their good friend—in fact, the three of them usually meet each week at the pub, but Dean has been out of sorts lately, so the question is whether or not Dean suspects his wife is having an affair.

Back home, Tony chooses not to tell Lisa about what Gasper saw, because Corrine is a friend of hers, but eventually Lisa worms it out of Tony and accuses him of keeping secrets from her. The discussion that ensues about what information couples should and shouldn’t share with each other pretty well encapsulates the theme of the play—and forces us to think about where we stand on whether or not married couples and close friends should or shouldn’t share everything with one another.

From this point on, things get more and more complicated. All three of the characters struggle with whether or not to tell Dean and Corrine what they know—or think they know—complicating those friendships. When Gasper shares information with Tony that he insists Tony not tell Lisa—who is also his friend—Tony is unable to do it, so Gasper retaliates by telling Lisa something Tony doesn’t want her to know, tossing a bomb in the middle of their relationship. Eventually, Lisa also confronts Corrine, and her story complicates matters further.

Suffice it to say that nobody comes out of this one unscathed. The play has many funny moments, although I was never quite sure if it was supposed to be a comedy. I also wouldn’t describe it as a serious play with funny moments. It’s an odd hybrid, which made it difficult to know how to react sometimes. The play also doesn’t go terribly deep into its subject. The friend with whom I attended the play described the plot as one that would make a good TV show, something you might happen upon, watch, be mildly interested in, and then forget immediately.

That said, I was certainly never bored by the play (although I did get a little tired of Tony’s over-the-top reactions to things, which the director might have reined in a bit). The relationships among the three are convincing, and the way they twist themselves up over who should be told what about whom, about when to tell the truth and when to hold things back, is entertaining. If you don’t go expecting an evening of deep examination of relationships, you’ll probably have a good time, because this really is a new take on adultery, and the playwright deserves credit for pulling it off.