Friday, August 28, 2026

Poet Mary Buchinger: Meshing the Spiritual and the Physical

 

Interview by Doug Holder



Recently I caught up with the former president of the New England Poetry Club, Mary Buchinger, to talk about her new, deeply spiritual collection of poems "There is only the sacred and the desecrated."

From the Lily poetry website:

"Mary Buchinger is the author of eight collections of poetry; in addition to There is only the sacred and the desecrated (Lily Poetry Review Books, 2026; Paul Nemser Book Prize, Honorable Mention), recent books include The Book of Shores (Lily Poetry Review Books, 2024; Permafrost Book Prize in Poetry finalist; Hillary Gravendyk Prize, semifinalist), Navigating the Reach (Salmon Poetry, Honors, 2024 Massachusetts Book Award), and Virology (Lily Poetry Review Books, 2022), and she is the winner of the 2024 Elyse Wolf/Slate Roof Chapbook Prize. Her poetry has appeared in many journals, including AGNI, Pedestal Magazine, Plume, Salt Hill, Salamander, Seneca Review, and is permanently installed in Cambridge, where she lives and served as Poetry Ambassador. She was a Peace Corps Volunteer in Ecuador and earned a doctorate in linguistics from Boston University; she teaches at the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences. Website: www.MaryBuchinger.com "


I noticed you quoted Rilke a number of times. Rilke wrote, " I know nothing has ever been real without my beholding it..." Is each day a sort of rebirth for you? Do you create your world, like you create a poem?


Yes, I think we all create the world each day. More and more I’m coming to understand how tenuous everything is. This is especially stark in the narratives that divide us. How we construct the world – our stories – is crucial and consequential. 


The title sequence, “There is Only the Sacred and the Desecrated,” is an exploration of world-making; it includes the true story of a Ukrainian woman whose husband and daughter had died and whose son was in a penal colony because he drank and violently abused her. When she was seventy years old, she picked up a paintbrush for the first time and painted the interior of her house with bright, wondrous scenes of flowers, green vines and branches, and birds. 


Francis of Assis asserted that all is sacred or desecrated, rather than sacred or profane. If all is essentially sacred, then there is the possibility of restitution for what has been desecrated. This is a very particular way of understanding our experience of life on earth, and, this is the lens for the title sequence.


You dedicate this book to the late Fanny Howe. She has been described as a poet who is most at home with bewilderment. Are you as the song goes, " Bewitched, bothered and bewildered' by the world?

Yes definitely I am all three! I relate to Fanny’s bewilderment, and feel that connection to the child self who is continually surprised by the cruelty and the beauty of the world, of others, and of the self. I think this is the locus of poetry – it is a place of wonder and curiosity and question. The place of knowing is prose. 

In your poem " Uttering joyous leaves all its lives" dedicated to Walt Whitman, you seem to bond with a gnarled cheery tree, and then "wave to the other side." Back in the 70s when I experimented with hallucinatory drugs, I actually felt that I was merging with a tree. It was the most wonderful experience, I felt I was finally part of something bigger than the visible word...I felt a certain unity. Was this like your experience—nature as a portal for connection—something outside our failing flesh?


It sounds like you had a powerful experience that has stayed with you, Doug. I guess I like to be reminded that I am nature too. There is a distinct relief I feel when I’m in a beautiful natural setting. I remember hearing an author on NPR talk about being in the wilderness and realizing that, unlike in the human-made world, nothing in the wild is designed to get your attention, nothing is directly addressing you or asking something of you, there is no media message in the wilderness  – and this affords real relief, the possibility of deep spiritual rest. The last poem in my book, “Song” (first published in Ibbetson!) directly speaks of this experience as I walked to school one morning along the Muddy River in the Fenway and observed the casual, unintentional beauty of the sun on the water, and felt “the I grow quiet/(except for the song).”


Your poetry deals with mortality, something I think about a lot as I get older. In your work, you seem to be standing back, observing your aging—a calm acceptance—a knowing nod. Do you fear death—or have you come to terms with it?


This is quite a question, Doug… Have I come to terms with death? I went to a Lutheran parochial school for my first twelve years of education and there was a lot of talk about death. It seemed like such a good idea to me – not to talk about it, but to be dead and in heaven. But at that point, I hadn’t really experienced loss yet, no one close to me had died. I think death is a disaster for the living. As you know, our poetry community has been hit especially hard these past couple of years with the loss of Danielle Legros Georges, Fanny Howe, Jennifer Martelli, Charles Coe, Neil Silberblatt, Karen Friedland, Ellin Sarot, Denise Washington. 

 

What I know of death is the sadness of being left behind. I think about my mother who’s 95, soon to be 96, and who has outlived and lost her brothers and sisters and so many friends. I have a vivid memory of a particular morning when I was a child, mixing milk for the calves on our farm. We’d measure out the dry milk mix into a pail of warm water, using our fingers to break up the clumps, and then swirl it till it was fully dissolved. I was up to my elbow in milk (metaphor for childhood?) and it was really a lovely feeling, so silky and warm – this is Michigan, in a barn, in winter. So this one morning, as we were mixing the milk, my mother said, This is what your life is. You stir and stir and stir the water, and when you stop, the ripples circle just a little while longer. I looked at the milk whirling in the pail as my arm went round and round, then I pulled out my hand, and watched the milk grow still. I was like, Oh.  


Why should we read your book?


I hope you read my book for the same reasons you read any book of poetry! That is, “to feel physically as if the top of [your] head were taken off” as Emily Dickinson described it, by which I think she means, when we read poetry we can escape the tyranny of the self. Ideally, it’s a kind of out-of-body, out-of-mind encounter. Poetry offers the opportunity to experience an authentic, genuine, wholly human and unique sensibility that is unlike our own. Reading poetry expands and deepens our attention (which is really what love is) and can transform how we understand our own life.




Red Letter Poem #312

The Red Letters

 

 

In ancient Rome, feast days were indicated on the calendar by red letters.

To my mind, all poetry and art serves as a reminder that every day we wake together beneath the sun is a red-letter day.

 

––Steven Ratiner

 

 

 

                                                

 

 

 

 

Red Letter Poem #313

 

 

 

 

Ode To Café Pamplona

Cambridge, MA  1959-2020

 

 

Gracias a ti, Josefina Yanguas Perez,

for your subterranean sanctuary

its white stucco walls and low ceilings

lit warmly yellow,

windowsills alive with geraniums,

laughter, pontifications,

writings, readings, ideas,

 

where your diminutive Basque body

floats in each day, nodding kaixo or hola

to David, who writes a poem for you and Lorca;

to linguist, Lee, sipping espresso,

uttering Alhamdulillah in any language

as a loner listens and a woman

in a black beret writes at a far table;

 

and always professors and students wrangling

over politics, music, philosophy,

where language reigns over the coffee grinder’s growl,

chairs scrape the checkered floor by patrons

coming and going for communitas and caffeine,

bowls of Iruña gazpacho, flat pork sandwiches, pastries—

orders awaiting young male waiters, lean

as their thin black ties.

 

 

                                          ––Kathleen Granchelli

 

 

 

 

 

Submitting her poems to the Red Letters, Kathleen Granchelli could never have predicted the nature nor intensity of my response––especially toward one piece in particular.  But just the mention of that name––CafĂ© Pamplona­­––triggered a cascade of vivid memories: it’s 1975, and I have moved (inexplicably) from sunny California back to the frigid Northeast.  The bookstore job I managed to snag nets me the princely sum of $80 per week––and thus any entertainments in my free time needed to be just that: free, or very inexpensive.  I discovered that Harvard’s excellent Fogg Art Museum offered complimentary admission; I relished my idylls in their galleries.  Then I’d enjoy an hour in the poetry section of one of the numerous used bookshops that existed at the time around Harvard Square––browsing is another marvelous low-cost delight.  Inspired, and seeking sustenance, I’d repair to CafĂ© Pamplona––a small below-ground coffeehouse with true Old World charm.  That’s because the owner, Josefina Yanguas, modeled the place on the cafĂ© life in the city of her beloved Spanish home.  Two bucks bought me a modest lunch and two hours sheltered from the cold. (I see you looking doubtful; a cappuccino for sixty cents!  A buck-and-a-quarter added a media noche sandwich to the order––with the remaining coins left on the saucer as a gratuity!)  I could read and write undisturbed because, if ever a courtly waiter approached a lingering customer, it was only to ask if he might bring another glass of water.  One word instantly comes to mind when I think of the Pamplona and, unsurprisingly, there it is right there at the outset of Kathleen’s poem: sanctuary.

 

But even if you’d never been a patron during the cafĂ©’s 60-year lifespan, this poet’s wealth of carefully-observed detail makes you feel you’re seated at a table beside the whitewashed walls, idling perhaps on your own day off.  This is a people-watching paradise so perhaps you, too, would soon be sketching thumbnail portraits of Cambridge luminaries and the dashing demimonde––inspired by the sepia fresco by Conger Metcalf adorning the corner wall.  The rat-a-tat cadences in Kathleen’s poem perfectly reflect the companionable chatter of “professors and students wrangling/ over politics, music, philosophy,/ where language reigns over the coffee grinder’s growl…”.  At a time when I could not afford a writing studio, Pamplona was not only my atelier but the shared incubator for a profusion of ideas and visions, forming quite a fine brother/sisterhood.  Among others, there’s a mention of the cafĂ© in Jhumpa Lahiri’s novel, The Namesake.  And yes, that’s Amanda Palmer, of the Dresden Dolls, singing this lyric within “Truce,”: "You can have Africa, Asia, Australia, as long as you keep your hands off CafĂ© Pamplona."  How many artworks, movies, memoirs––not to mention love affairs––first took root in Josefina’s version of a public salon? 

 

And now add Kathleen to that list of bards celebrating this dearly-missed meeting place.  Perhaps that’s her, seated (virtually) by one of the few windows that allow a bit of sunlight into this espresso-scented cavern.  Shall I make an introduction?  For most of her career, Kathleen led the communications and community relations office for a not-for-profit R&D organization, following four years teaching students at the high school and college levels.  But upon retirement, her passion for poetry was reignited; her work has since appeared in such magazines as Mediterranean Poetry, Persimmon Tree, Seven Bridges Digital Magazine, and The Orchards Poetry Journal––many of her pieces reflecting her experience living in Australia and Greece.  Her chapbook, For the World, She Said, is slated to be published by Kelsay Books later this year or early in 2027.  All this reminds me of the almost infinite variety of reasons we are drawn to the work of certain poets: because of kindred memories; unimagined but enticing landscapes; or stylistic flourishes that strike some hidden emotional chord.  On first reading Kathleen’s poems, I was struck by this revelation: how much we have in common, often unaware.  How frequently we discover that some stranger’s vivid life-experience, their simmering dreams, their distant yet persistent music, creates a sympathetic vibration with our own minds.  How many passing close by us this very day once shared the same park or crowded cafĂ©, the inexorable pull of a first line of poetry in their ear like some siren song?  A poem, too, is a gathering place for strangers to commune.  Thank you, Josefina!  Thank you, Kathleen!  The next round’s on me!

 

 

 

The Red Letters

 

* If you would like to receive these poems every Friday in your own in-box – or would like to write in with comments or submissions – send correspondence to:

steven.arlingtonlaureate@gmail.com

 

 

* To learn more about the origins of the Red Letter Project, check out an essay I wrote for Arrowsmith Magazine:

https://www.arrowsmithpress.com/community-of-voices

 

* The weekly installment is also available at

the Boston Area Small Press and Poetry Scene

http://dougholder.blogspot.com

 

* For updates and announcements about Red Letter projects and poetry readings, please follow me on BlueSky

@stevenratiner.bsky.social

and on Twitter          

@StevenRatiner

 

And visit the Red Letter archives at: