Volume 33, Issue 1
Faculty Advisor Dan Sklar
Faculty Advisor Dan Sklar
Just as Dan Shaughnessy feels compelled to tell us that John
Henry owns both the Red Sox and the sports page he writes for, I need to
disclose upfront that I accepted Doug Holder's invitation to review this issue
with a certain trepidation because he is the faculty editor of the Review as
well as the editor of this blog. But my trepidation was replaced with pleasure
as, over the last two weeks, I have found myself returning again and again to
its pages. At first I was drawn by some of the excellent photographs and art
reproduced in it.
Two of the many images worth
mentioning are a painting by Lauren Gallagher of the upper torso and head of a
young woman who is lying on her side half in water so that we contemplate a
horizontal symmetry created by her reflection and a visual joke by Lindsay
Silverman that is a photo of an egg cooked over easy lying on a pink plate with
a vertical smile sliced across the yolk presumably by the hatchet arranged like
an eating utensil beside the plate.
I would have appreciated some
information about the contributors to The Review which “consists of creative
work from the Endicott Community and other contributors,” because I was left to
wonder, if “Tightening,” by Richard W. Moyer, which ends, "Each talk, each
pull makes/you look young again,/forget that you are sixty." was a good
poem about plastic surgery by an “other” or an astonishing feat of imagination
by an undergraduate.
Several poems in the collection give that pleasure which
comes from a display of technical facility. The most complex of these,by Alex
Munteanu, has six stanzas of six lines ending in the same six words (morning,
again, mind, LA, dreams and weekend). The first line of each stanza ends with
the word that ends the last line of the previous stanza and the seventh stanza
has three lines:
Again I've promised to take your
dreams
with me to Denver because we hate
LA in our mind.
I'm glad this weekend is finally
over, I'm moving on to morning.
Each of which contains two of the line ending words and the
poem ends by circling back to make an intriguing exploration of the title
"Everything Again" as it concludes with “morning” which ended the
first line of the poem
So in contemplating this poem yet again I too am circling
back to one of my initial trepidations about doing this review. On my first
read through of the collection I had dismissed "Everything Again"
because I was too absorbed in my preconceptions about the Review’s undergraduate
content to pay attention to its complexity, which now gives me much pleasure.
I had been pulled into the Endicott Review by the excellence
of some of the images scattered through its pages because they absorbed me,
wholly and quickly. That satisfaction slowed me down so that I then took time to
examine the writing and I discovered that while some of it is by undergraduates whose writing often triggered my editorial instincts and that response was only another
of the pleasures to be encountered here. After all a poem that is good enough
to leave you thinking of ways it might be better is a poem that has left you
thinking creatively and on many days a little creative thinking is the best
that one can hope for.
**** Wendell Smith is a Somerville Bagel Bard, poet, retired physician, and one of the first reporters for the old Cambridge Phoenix (a predecessor to the now defunct Boston Phoenix)
**** Wendell Smith is a Somerville Bagel Bard, poet, retired physician, and one of the first reporters for the old Cambridge Phoenix (a predecessor to the now defunct Boston Phoenix)
No comments:
Post a Comment