ISBN 978-0-9965026-3-413.95. April 2017
Can We Talk About Poetry?
By Ed Meek
Does poetry matter? Apparently some people don’t think so. Others do. The New York Times did a “Room for Debate”
a couple of years ago asking this question of seven poets who each, in a
couple of paragraphs, answer in the affirmative. There was an
influential essay that appeared in The Atlantic Monthly
way back in 1991 called “Can Poetry Matter?” In it, Dana Gioia
discussed the way that poetry had, on the one hand, developed through
burgeoning MFA programs and published books, but on the other hand,
wasn’t really read by most of us. So this is a question that has been
around for a while. Robert Pinsky made an attempt to confront this issue
with the “Favorite
Poem Project” when he was Poet Laureate of the U.S. He traveled around
the country recording ordinary Americans reading and reciting their
favorite poems. Although this seemed like a good idea to promote poetry,
listening to ordinary Americans recite favorite poems was not exactly
inspiring.
For about thirty years I taught English. I taught
in colleges and in high schools. At the college level, the number of
English majors kept shrinking over those years. Luckily, we discovered
that students still needed to learn how to write so we focused on
Composition. Now pretty much everyone has to take Composition. Poetry is
optional. Yet Creative Writing as an elective remains popular and MFA
Programs are growing and thriving.
Teaching high school I was surprised to learn that
a number of my colleagues didn’t teach poetry or creative writing.
There were state tests to prepare for. “What do you do with poetry,
anyway?” one colleague complained. Getting students to read and analyze
poetry isn’t easy, but in my experience they love writing it. Maybe this
is partly due to their somewhat misguided impression that it is just a
way to express your emotions and no can criticize the way you feel. But
there has also developed over the past thirty or so years a respect for
rhymes and raps and spoken word—an appreciation of wordsmiths. Students,
it turns out, enjoy wordplay, clever turns of phrase and heartfelt
expression. So poetry does apparently matter.
Roseanne Ritzema, publisher and editor of Presa Press seems to think so. She has put together a collection of essays called Poetry Matters. It’s a slim volume of thirteen essays by half a dozen poets and publishers of independent poetry. In Poetry Matters,
the essays are by Hugh Fox, John Amen, Erix Greinke, Harry Smith, Kirby
Congdon and Richard Kostelanetz. These are not formal essays. They are
more like conversations with the reader about what poetry is, what
elements it must contain, the role poetry plays. There has existed, for
as long as higher education has been around, a division in poetry and
probably in other arts as well between academics and those outside of
academia. Being on the inside has numerous advantages for writers in
terms of publication, reviews and of course, making a living teaching
writing. But what happens when we have hundreds of MFA programs? Schools
of poetry are developed and that results in poetry being aimed at a
rather narrow audience that speaks a certain insider language. When
these academic poets become poetry editors, poetry becomes incestuous.
Anyone who submits poetry to magazines will see some variation of the
following in most guidelines for submission. “Read our magazine so
you’ll know what we like before submitting.” The implication is: don’t
send us anything original! The problem can be seen and heard in how
readers respond to the poems that regularly appear in The New Yorker, The Atlantic and Poetry Magazine. They seldom understand them and they don’t often like them.
The poets and publishers in Poetry Matters
understand this division. They are writing from the outside. They
identify with poets like Whitman, Ginsberg, Bukowski, Bly, Lifshin and,
although they don’t mention her, Eileen Myles. They want the
gatekeepers on the inside to open the gates. The best essay in the
anthology is by John Amen, the Vice-President of New York Quarterly, the editor of Pedestal Magazine
and an established poet and editor. Amen says, “What keeps me engaged
in the editorial process…is encountering an example of unconsidered
excellence.” As writers, this is all we can hope for in an editor. Poet
and publisher Eric Greinke argues for a poetic community that is more
inclusive. “If poetry is the highest form of art, as Plato stated, then
why aren’t our poets sanctioned with the same artistic freedom as the
presumably lower arts.” In other words, if Picasso can experiment with
so many different forms and styles, why can’t poets? In “Eight
Attributes of Poetry” Harry Smith, poet publisher and literary activist,
attempt a definition of poetry by elucidating what he sees as its
elements: symbolism, metaphor, prophecy, music, play, experience,
emotion and design.” Frost, of course, claimed poetry must move from
“delight to wisdom” but wisdom seems in short supply today. Poetry can
also be thought of as a mix of metaphor, music and meaning. The best
poets, to my way of thinking, combine all three.
In a recent interview in The Paris Review, Ben Lerner talks about a problem he sees as endemic to poetry.
The
main demand associated with lyric poetry is that an individual poet can
or must produce both a song that’s irreducibly individual—it’s the
expression of their specific humanity, because it’s this intense,
internal experience—and that is also shareable by everyone, because it
can be intelligible to all social persons, so it can unite a community
in its difference. And that demand… is impossible.
Well, it wasn’t impossible for Yeats or Frost or Whitman, but it does seem more difficult today.
Still, when a loved one dies or when we are
confronted by momentous events like the recent election, people reach
for poems. My friend Steve Wood called me up to talk the day after the
election and he started off referring to “The Second Coming.” “Things
fall apart; the centre cannot hold…the best lack all conviction, while
the worst are full of passionate intensity.” I mentioned Auden’s line:
“We must love one another or die.” For poetry to matter, it must be able
to fulfill those kinds of needs. There must be great poems we can reach
for when we want to respond to death or to calamity or change. It’s
obvious that journalism and our media cannot play that role. Social
media, addictive as it may be, leaves us unfulfilled.
If you write poetry it is a pleasure to read
writing about poetry by other people who love poetry. You might not
always be on the same page with them but hearing their point of view is
still a pleasure. Apparently, poetry does still matter. I do wish it
were a little more significant and that it mattered a little more.
No comments:
Post a Comment