Review
of Marc D. Goldfinger’s Heroin’s Harbour ( Ibbetson Streeet Press) by Gregory J. Wolos
The Split Man
Heroin’s harbor is the addict, as Marc D. Goldfinger’s collection of poems and
stories, Heroin’s Harbour makes
harrowingly clear. Heroin is the body of the addict that craves the drug, and
it’s the mind of the addict that cooperates with the insistent body,
paradoxically rationalizing any action that might provide safe harbor for a
poison. Human beings are frail things, ultimately, Goldfinger’s poems and
stories illustrate, too weak to commit to our resolutions or to stave off
gratifications that have become needs. Goldfinger’s work does more than merely
describe the habits, lifestyle, and thoughts of a junkie; he takes his reader
hostage, straps us to the back of his motorcycle so that we do more than simply
observe—we participate. Goldfinger’s craft enables us, along with him, to feel
the needle and the need.
In “A Junkie’s Prayer,” one of the
first poems in the first section of Heroin’s Harbour, “An Epistle to Opium,” the
reader is told what the junkie prays for: not redemption, not relief, not
freedom from addiction. The narrator of this poem is so embedded in his world
of dependency—the “harbor” of the drug—that what is prayed for are his most
immediate needs: “please keep our needles disease free”; “keep us safe from
those who would poison our dope”; “keep the police the police from our door”;
“keep us free from abscess.” What is prayed for is not an escape, but that
“heroin’s sweet sleep” will “ease the pain that lives within our hearts.” The
junkie does not beg for a way out and doesn’t seem to want one, asking only
that God “keep watch over the farmers and the fields of poppies they tend.”
A poem like “What Would You Do for a
Fix?” lacks a religious core, but uses liturgical “call and response” and
repetition to emphasize the all-encompassing nature of a junkie’s need. In this
poem, there are sins against the family: “For a fix/ I would steel my mother’s
purse; For a fix/ I would take my sister’s coin collection; For a fix/ I would
desert my children.” There are sins against the purity of his own body: “For a
fix/ I would risk hepatitis; For a fix/ I would shoot toilet water.” There are
sins against society: “For a fix/ I would take the money out of the pocket of
an unconscious man on the street, For a fix / I would sell dangerous drugs to
novices.” Later in the poem, further biblical allusion occurs in another
repeated construction: “In the beginning, I got high because I liked it./ In
the end I got high because it was all I had left . . . In the beginning I got
high because I was searching for the way./ In the end I got high because I was
searching for the way out.” As the narrator concludes in “I Have Trouble with
Names”: “Some of us name the Gods. / I have trouble with names.”
Love itself for the junkie isn’t to
be found through religion, as Goldfinger testifies in “Drug Store Christ
(Heist): “They tell me to turn to Jesus Christ/ Just wait till I do this drug
store heist/ . . . ‘Well, we found God/Just sittin’ in the safe of that drug
store.’” And True Love for one’s significant other, as described in “Junkie
Love” means “giving her the biggest hit,” or when you’re strung out and broke
and don’t ask her to hit the streets.”
Again and again, Goldfinger repeats
the message stated in “Death Trippin,” one of the poems written in hard driving
couplets that he suggests are “songs” but are all the more frightening in that
they come off more as feverish rants: “One thing I know, Heroin’s the best/ For
nullifying the pain that’s in my chest.” The shift from reading Goldfinger’s
poems to reading his short stories is like a shift from listening to songs to
watching a movie that uses those songs as background music. The refrain stated
in the poem “Getting Fixed in South Carolina”: “addiction only remembers what
it needs” throbs through the prose of stories that describe in detail the
underworld of junkies. There are stories about dealing with crooked pharmacists
and hard-ass police (“A Controlled Dangerous Substance Act”); stories about
navigating life with various women who shared the narrator’s addictions (“Femme
Fatale”); stories about obtaining prescriptions from doctors (“Running on Empty
in Vermont”); stories about living in filth and failing to care for those
innocents for whom you’re responsible (“Two Dogs and a Kitten”). The long poem
“Getting Fixed in South Carolina” is itself expanded into a short story that
depicts the life-threatening hazards a junkie will undertake to satisfy his
habit. These stories powerfully convey the life of addicts whose focus is
reduced to remembering “what it needs.” But even detailed stories are
insufficiently descriptive, Goldfinger asserts in “The Rocking Chair,” which
shows a recovering junkie’s return home to aged and ailing parents: “The imagination
is limited when it comes to the real. Things get left out.”
Recovery for the junkie seems a
struggle doomed to Sisyphean failure. In his second section of poems, “The
Fight to Stay Clean,” Goldfinger presents several portraits of those lost to
drugs (“Medusa with Fire,” “One of the Tough Guys,” “Significant Other,” “Open
Casket,” “The Way She Shakes”), or those who will be (“A Couple of Kids”). But
there is a whisper of hope in the sisterhood of “The Angels of Gloucester,” who
“walk an ancient path now, join hands at signs of trouble, hug each other’s
children, knit their families into hot strong blankets with threads of prayer.”
Ultimately, Goldfinger points to the necessity of the recovering junkie never
losing sight of the fact that he is “The Split Man”: two alternate realities,
this poem illustrates, are perpetually present, contending for the junkie’s
heart: “I am the happy married man/ the junkie in the street begging/ the
house-owner sitting sitting at my
computer/ in the bathroom sticking a needle in my arm . . . / I am a split man,
this half of me dances with joy/ I am a split man, this half of me is dying day
by day/ I can choose, I can stand by a lake holding the hand of my wife/ or my
choices are gone, I probe my arm looking for a vein.”
With devastating honesty and
heartbreaking detail, Marc D. Goldfinger offers in his poems and stories
glimpses into the lives of tortured souls who have abandoned themselves to an
all-consuming, unsafe harbor. “A junkie’s body never forgets,” he concludes in the
poem “All of Me”: “If it was just physical, I would never use dope/ again. It
is not my body, it is me, all of me, my body, my soul, my mind/ interlocked in
heroin hypnosis, even/ free, I will never be free again.” Goldfinger’s words
seem less buoys warning of an unsafe passage than a testament to the hope of a
single split man’s survival.
